🔗 Share this article

The nation's controversial policy to ban social platforms access for those under 16 is sparking debate around the globe. Lawmakers, safety advocates, and families are observing intently to see if this approach will become a template for other nations.

Across Europe Trend

Throughout Europe, a growing chorus of countries are considering similar measures.

• Denmark has stated a restriction on social media for under-15s, with the prime minister stating that phones and platforms are "robbing our kids' youth". Legislation could be passed in the coming year.
• The Norwegian government is set to introduce a access barrier of 15, highlighting the need to protect the young from the "power of the recommendation systems".
• Ireland is developing a online verification tool to confirm the user details of social media users. Authorities have indicated that an Australia-style ban could be "a potential measures under consideration".
• In Spain, the leader has called on parliament to enact a bill lifting the minimum age for accessing social media to 16.
• In France, the leader has proposed a ban for under-15s, and a government panel has endorsed a related step, including an overnight "screen time restriction" for adolescents.
• The authorities in The Dutch government has advised families to prevent their kids from social media before 15.

At the EU level, the European parliament has approved a advisory statement supporting a ban for under-16s unless parental consent is granted. While it cautions of the "compulsive" quality of these apps, the move does not enact enforceable legislation.

"An effective age barrier is a useful first step," said one European lawmaker behind the resolution.

The United Kingdom: A Watchful Stance

In the UK, the administration has kept open a possible ban, emphasizing that "no option is being dismissed" but insisting any policy must be "based on conclusive research".

Earlier, interest built behind a legislative effort to enact controls on social media use by minors, but it was eventually weakened. However, the administration pledged to conduct more studies the topic.

Advocacy groups have expressed warnings. A prominent charity founded by the family of a girl who took her own life after viewing dangerous online content contends that a blanket age ban could fail to improve online safety and could lead to a "dangerous transition" of exposure when users become eligible.

"Australia's ban is a reaction to the inability of the Silicon Valley to create products and services that are secure and age appropriate for children," commented a influential peer.

The US: A Fragmented Picture

In the United States, regulation is largely happening at the regional level amid national gridlock.

• Utah requires guardian permission for under-18s to use social media and restricts nighttime use.
• Florida has signed a bill prohibiting those below 14 from joining social media, though it is subject to court battles.
• The state of Virginia has enacted a regulation restricting minors to one hour of social media access per day, with any further use requiring adult consent.
• The state of Georgia, Tennessee, and Louisiana have also introduced measures mandating parental consent for under-16s to create social media presences.

Even with widespread concern and suggestions from various figures to follow Australia's path, a federal ban is presently seen as improbable.

Worldwide Outlook

Beyond Europe and the US, further states are also taking action.

• The Malaysian government aims to prohibit social media for teenagers starting from next year.
• The Brazilian authorities has increased the required age for one major platform to 16.

However, global organizations strike a more measured position. Unicef has cautioned that age-based restrictions have downsides and "could prove counterproductive". The organization points out that social networks can be a "lifeline" for vulnerable youth and that government action should not be a "excuse" for social media firms to prioritize safety.

While this international discussion evolves, the policies of Australia and its followers demonstrate that governments around the world are increasingly willing to wait for platforms to act voluntarily.